Alexander v. Employment Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the employees are not disqualified from benefits if work stoppage is due to an employer lockout, because the legislature intended an understanding similar to the holding in Erie Forge & Steel Corp.
• “[I]n general, a lockout has been defined as ‘a cessation of the furnishing of work to employees or a withholding of work from them in an effort to get for the employer more desirable terms.’”
• “[I]n general, a lockout has been defined as ‘a cessation of the furnishing of work to employees or a withholding of work from them in an effort to get for the employer more desirable terms.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).