Alexander v. City of Greensboro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing plaintiffs’ § 1981 claim against a municipality for satisfaction of the requirements for liability under § 1983
• noting, in the context of disparate discipline, that “precise equivalence ... between employees” is unnecessary “to plead an inferential case” (citing Moore v. City of Charlotte, N.C., 754 F.2d 1100, 1107 (4th Cir. 1985))
• “Because [Defendant] properly received this information, her disclosure of it did not constitute intrusion into seclusion, so Plaintiffs cannot rely upon this disclosure for their invasion of privacy claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).