Skip to main content

Alexander v. Chapman

Citations

  • 711 S.W.2d 765
  • 289 Ark. 238
  • 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing when there were twenty-eight objections by appellant to leading questions, appellee was repeatedly admonished by trial judge and objections sustained but appellee’s conduct not stopped
  • reversing when there were twenty-eight objections by appellant to leading questions, appellee was repeatedly admonished by trial judge and objections sustained but appellee's conduct not stopped
  • reversing when there were twenty-eight objections by appellant to leading questions, appellee was repeatedly admonished by trial judge and objections sustained but appellee’s conduct not stopped
  • where there were twenty-eight objections and repeated admonitions, but the appellee’s conduct did not stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickman, Holt, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.