Alexander v. Breeden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing tacking in the context of the conversion of warrants for common stock in a cashless transaction
• rejecting the argument that the value of cashless warrants rendered the interest rate on a promissory note usurious where, inter alia, “it was not clear that any effective interest rate in excess of 25% would ever have to be paid, as the value of the warrants was uncertain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).