· 9/2/1994
Alexander Shokai, Inc. Edward Alexander Estelle Alexander v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Citations
- 34 F.3d 1480
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 12475
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6748
- 74 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6150
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying a parallel statute but concluding that petitioners had not demonstrated that his expert was “necessary for the presentation of the case.”
- affirming tax court’s finding of fraudulent intent based on four badges of fraud: underreporting income, keeping inadequate records, concealing income, and providing inconsistent explanations
- fraud may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, including such “badges of fraud” as understatement of income, inadequate records, and implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior
- fraud may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, including such “badges of fraud” as understatement of income, inadequate records, and implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior
- setting forth standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, O'Scannlain, Trott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.