Skip to main content
· 9/2/1994

Alexander Shokai, Inc. Edward Alexander Estelle Alexander v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 1480
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 12475
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6748
  • 74 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6150
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a parallel statute but concluding that petitioners had not demonstrated that his expert was “necessary for the presentation of the case.”
  • affirming tax court’s finding of fraudulent intent based on four badges of fraud: underreporting income, keeping inadequate records, concealing income, and providing inconsistent explanations
  • fraud may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, including such “badges of fraud” as understatement of income, inadequate records, and implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior
  • fraud may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, including such “badges of fraud” as understatement of income, inadequate records, and implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior
  • setting forth standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, O'Scannlain, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.