Alexander Sandor MOLNAR, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. EBASCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee’s subjective belief that age discrimination occurred is insufficient to create jury issue when employer articulates an adequate nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge
• finding the plaintiff’s claim that he was clearly better qualified than retained employees 2 See Kass v. Albemarle Corp., No. 00-30044 (5th Cir. June 7, 2000). 3 insufficient to support a jury verdict
• subjective belief that age discrimination was basis of discharge is insufficient to make an issue for the jury when employer articulates an adequate nondiscriminatory reason
• employee's subjective belief that age discrimination occurred is insufficient to create jury issue when employer articulates an adequate nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge
• subjective belief that age discrimination was basis of discharge is insufficient to make an issue for the jury when employer articulates an adequate 16 nondiscriminatory reason
• “[T]estimony by an employee regarding his subjective belief that his termination resulted from age discrimination is insufficient to make an issue for the jury in the face of proof showing an adequate, nondiscriminatory reason for his release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).