Alexander M. v. Hon. abrams/ades

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding juvenile court impermissibly delegated its duty to independently determine whether reunification was in children’s best interests to a state agency
• “Arizona’s statutes, case law, and rules of procedure reflect that the juvenile court is obligated . . . to consider the best interests of the child in every decision[.]”
• “Arizona’s statutes, case law and rules of procedure reflect that the juvenile court is obligated to oversee the dependency case, [and] to consider the best interests of the child in every decision.”
• “[T]he juvenile court is obligated to oversee the dependency case, to consider the best interests of the child in every decision, and to ‘independently review the decisions and recommendations of [DCS].’”
• “Arizona’s statutes, case law, and rules of procedure reflect that the juvenile court is obligated to oversee the dependency case, [and] to consider the best interests of the child in every decision____”
• “Arizona’s statutes, case law and rules of procedure reflect that the juvenile court is obligated to oversee the dependency case, [and] to consider the best interests of the child in every decision . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).