Alexander L. Baxter v. Jim Rose, James Davis, Nicky Jordan, Scotty Smith, Bobby Pevahouse, Bert Staggs, and Jim Bevis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that McGore applies “where the district court dismisses cases sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A”
• holding that McGore applies “where the district court dismisses cases sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A”
• holding that McGore applies “where the district court dismisses cases sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A”
• requiring courts to “assess the fundamental viability of the claim on the basis of the initial complaint” and “efficiently evaluate] whether the plaintiff met the exhaustion requirement”
• requiring courts to “assess the fundamental viability of the claim on the basis of the initial complaint” and “efficiently evaluat[e] whether the plaintiff met the exhaustion requirement”
• same “where the district court dismisses cases sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).