Skip to main content
· 12/2/1957

Alexander Butwinski v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Citations

  • 249 F.2d 644
  • 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Recovery of medical expense in a Jones Act case is not prohibited as long as plaintiff is not permitted an additional recovery for the same expenses under a count for maintenance and cure.”
  • double recovery of medical expenses not permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Moore, Leibell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.