· 12/2/1957
Alexander Butwinski v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Citations
- 249 F.2d 644
- 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Recovery of medical expense in a Jones Act case is not prohibited as long as plaintiff is not permitted an additional recovery for the same expenses under a count for maintenance and cure.”
- double recovery of medical expenses not permitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Moore, Leibell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.