Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. Edward Van Impe and Edward L. Noyes & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that res judicata “does not bar claims arising subsequent to the entry of [a prior] judgment and which did not then exist or could not have been sued upon in the prior action”
• “Res judicata applies, however, only to claims arising prior to the entry of judgment. It does not bar claims arising subsequent to the entry of judgment and which did not then exist or could not have been sued upon in the prior action.” (emphasis in original)
• “Res judicata applies . . . only to claims arising prior to the entry of judgment. It does not bar claims arising subsequent to the entry of judgment and which did not then exist or could not have been sued upon in the prior action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).