Alex Vesely v. Armslist LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• advising that a motion for reconsideration should not “be used to ‘rehash’ previously rejected arguments”
• explaining that \a Rule 59(e) motion is not to be used to rehash previously rejected arguments\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that \a Rule 59(e) motion is not to be used to rehash previously rejected arguments\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that at the motion to dismiss stage, the court must “draw all inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
• stating that a Rule 59(e) motion is not meant to rehash previously rejected arguments
• explaining “a Rule 59(e) motion is not to be used to ‘rehash’ previously rejected arguments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).