Alex v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fair and reasonable inference from the evidence was that the defendant – a recently-terminated, former Jack in the Box employee – entered the restaurant without the owner’s alleged consent, even though no witness specifically 12 testified to a lack of consent, where: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas Joseph Gamelin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2019-03-12
• Jose Luis Moreno v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2020-12-04
• Jaray Tyrell Mims v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2020-12-31

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Brooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-06· cited 6,365×
• Hooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-01-31· cited 5,494×
• Malik v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 4,984×
• Clayton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-10-10· cited 4,127×
• Hartsfield v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-03-09· cited 543×
• Byrd v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-30· cited 373×
• Hathorn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-28· cited 275×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 67×
• James Wesley Brooks Jackson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-02-04· cited 15×