Alex G. v. Board of Trustees of Davis Joint Unified School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants’ request for a TRO to unilaterally change the student’s educational placement was a factor to prove adverse action by the defendant
• holding the school district’s actions, rather than retaliatory, were motivated by a desire to protect staff and fellow students from the student’s dangerous behavior
• holding the actions of a disabled child’s parents, including filing requests for a due process hearing, and writing a letter complaining about the implementation of a settlement agreement, arguably established a prima face case of retaliation
• use of physical restraints against aggressive and violent autistic student not unlawful despite parents’ non-consent, where state law allows such restraints when the student poses an immediate danger to himself or others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).