Aletha Rollins and Jessie Rollins v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal employee’s FTCA claims were precluded by the CSRA
• describing the CSRA as establishing “the comprehensive and exclusive procedures for settling work-related controversies between federal civil- service employees and the federal government”
• Bivens claims alleging violations of First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and Privacy Act violations
• civil service law provides the exclusive procedures for settling work-related disputes between federal civil-service employees and the federal government and preempts any state-law remedies
• Bivens claims alleging ______ violations of First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and Privacy Act violations
• “Bivens actions by federal employees against their employers for First Amendment violations have been expressly precluded by this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).