Skip to main content

Alesna v. LeGrue

Citations

  • 614 P.2d 1387
  • 1980 Alas. LEXIS 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address a negligence theory that \was not raised below and [wa]s inadequately briefed on appeal\
  • Unlawful service of liquor to intoxicated patron who, while driving, collided with motorcycle on which plaintiff was a passenger
  • dram shop case where the appellate court in footnote did not express an opinion on per se in approving summary judgment on another basis
  • dram shop case where the appellate court in footnote did not express an opinion on per se in approving summary judgment on another basis
  • Barton held that liquor licensees cannot be civilly liable if they do not exercise, and have no power to control the business. Alesna held that a licensee may be civilly liable for business violation of state liquor laws, thus, overruling Barton on that point.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Boochever, Burke, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.