Alejandro Luna, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jose Pico and Allen Cave, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board” (emphasis in original
• discussing when evidence is “reliable” so as to satisfy the due process right of a prisoner within the context of a prison disciplinary hearing
• “[T]he requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board . . . .” (alteration in original
• “[T]he requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board.” (alteration in original
• “[T]he requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board . . . .” (alteration in original
• “[T]he requirements of due process are satisfied if some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board . . . .” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).