Alejandro Cuevas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that instructions that relied on a case that “was inapposite” did not need to be given
• noting that appellate court must “accept all credibility choices . . . the jury made to support its verdict”
• summary charts are substantive evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).