Skip to main content
· 1/29/1997

Alegria v. Keeney

Citations

  • 687 A.2d 1249
  • 44 ERC (BNA) 1856
  • 1997 R.I. LEXIS 28
  • 1997 WL 33587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hearing and decision on the merits of a takings claim based on denial of building application under the Rhode Island Freshwater Wetlands Act
  • claimant filed application to construct four buildings in wetlands, but never sought approval for construction of fewer buddings
  • after denying an applicant's administrative appeal, the Superior Court allowed the applicant to file an amended appeal for a separate trial on the \takings\ issue
  • after denying an applicant's administrative appeal, the Superior Court allowed the applicant to file an amended appeal for a separate trial on the \takings\ issue
  • knowledge of plaintiff of regulatory limitation on development of land relevant in determining reasonableness of investment-backed expectations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lederberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.