ALEA London Limited v. Woodcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the duty to defend and the duty to pay are independent contractual obligations and citing approvingly to our holding in Trizec Properties v. Biltmore Construction Co., 767 F.2d 810, 812 (11th Cir.1985
• holding ambiguities are strictly construed against the insurer as drafter
• \[I]t is well established that a court should avoid an interpretation of a contract which renders portions of the language of the contract meaningless.\ (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “On appeal, we examine the record in the light most favorable to the verdict and judgment. A jury verdict, after approval by the trial court, and the judgment thereon will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by any evidence, in the absence of any material error of law.”
• “On appeal, we examine the record in the light most favorable to the verdict and judgment. A jury verdict, after approval by the trial court, and the judgment thereon will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by any evidence, in the absence of any material error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).