Alderson v. Bergdahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]here there is a conflict in testimony, credibility determinations and the resolution of evidentiary conflicts are within the [Board]’s discretion and are not subject to reevaluation on judicial review”
• holding that “[w]here there is a conflict in testimony, credibility determinations and the resolution of evidentiary conflicts are within the [Board]’s discretion and are not subject to reevaluation on judicial review”
• noting that while “there may be record evidence to the contrary, findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence are conclusive” and credibility determinations are in the Board’s discretion
• “Where there is a conflict in testimony, credibility determinations and the resolution of evidentiary conflicts are within the [Board’s] discretion and are not subject to reevaluation on judicial review.”
• considering whether the claimant deliberately violated the employer’s work rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).