Skip to main content
· 8/7/1986

Alderman v. Lámar

Citations

  • 493 So. 2d 495
  • 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the regulation requiring the Florida Highway Patrol to report damaged road signs did not impose a duty to report or repair damaged signs
  • holding that FHP regulation requiring officers to report damaged road signs did not impose a duty to report damaged signs, repair them, or warn motorists of the potential dangers
  • determining that police had no duty to warn of leaning stop sign when they had no right to control or possess the intersections, roads, or stop signs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.