Michigan Supreme Court· 4/30/2010
Alderman v. JC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES, LLC
Citations
- 780 N.W.2d 840
- 486 Mich. 906
- 2010 Mich. LEXIS 868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “two to six employees of one subcontractor” was not a significant number under the common work area doctrine
- holding that exposing “two to six employees of one subcontractor” to the risk of electrocution was not enough to meet the third element of the common work area doctrine
- “The only employees exposed to the risk of electrocution were two to six employees of one subcontractor, including the plaintiff, and therefore there was not a high degree of risk to a significant number of workers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Alderman v. JC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES, LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.