Skip to main content
· 5/3/2011

Alcoa Power Generating Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 963
  • 395 U.S. App. D.C. 425
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20173
  • 72 ERC (BNA) 1865
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9041
  • 2011 WL 1642442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the Clean Water Act “reinforc[ed] the role of States as the prime bulwark in the effort to abate water pollution” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discussing the fitness and hardship determinations without classifying such considerations prudential or constitutional
  • “[T]he Conference Report on Section 401 states that the time limitation was meant to ensure that ‘sheer inactivity by the State . . . will not frustrate the Federal application.’”
  • “[T]he purpose of the waiver provision is to prevent a State from indefinitely delaying a federal licensing proceeding by failing to issue a timely water quality certification under Section 401.”
  • “In imposing a one-year time limit on States to ‘act,’ Congress plainly intended to limit the amount of time that a State could delay a federal licensing proceeding without making a decision on the certification request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.