· 5/3/2011
Alcoa Power Generating Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Citations
- 643 F.3d 963
- 395 U.S. App. D.C. 425
- 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20173
- 72 ERC (BNA) 1865
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9041
- 2011 WL 1642442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the Clean Water Act “reinforc[ed] the role of States as the prime bulwark in the effort to abate water pollution” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
- discussing the fitness and hardship determinations without classifying such considerations prudential or constitutional
- “[T]he Conference Report on Section 401 states that the time limitation was meant to ensure that ‘sheer inactivity by the State . . . will not frustrate the Federal application.’”
- “[T]he purpose of the waiver provision is to prevent a State from indefinitely delaying a federal licensing proceeding by failing to issue a timely water quality certification under Section 401.”
- “In imposing a one-year time limit on States to ‘act,’ Congress plainly intended to limit the amount of time that a State could delay a federal licensing proceeding without making a decision on the certification request.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.