Alchemy II, Inc. v. Yes! Entertainment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using a substantial similarity analysis where plaintiff asserted both copyright and trade dress infringement claims based on its product design
• claims of misdirected phone calls, a declaration regarding third-party comments showing confusion, and a newspaper article referring to defendant’s product as a newer “version” of plaintiffs product, were all inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).