Alcala v. Mid-Century Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• policy did not “exclude [plaintiff] from coverage”; rather, “she was never included when riding on a motorcycle not insured under the policy”
• policy did not “exclude [plaintiff] from coverage”; rather, “she was never included when riding on a motorcycle not insured under the policy”
• passenger on lent motorcycle not an “insured person” under driver’s policy that covered driver’s own vehicle; “insured person[s]” included named insured and his family, but “coverage is afforded to strangers to the policy only when they occupy an insured vehicle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).