Albuja v. National Broadcasting Co. Universal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a pretrial as-applied challenge to a § 249 claim because the Government alleged that the weapon used in the attack traveled in interstate commerce
• rejecting as-applied challenge involving assault with a weapon, but noting that “it might be unconstitutional to apply the [Hate Crimes Act] ... if the weapon [the defendant] used had not traveled- in interstate or foreign commerce, or if he had not used any weapon at all”
• rejecting as-applied challenge involving assault with a weapon, but noting that “it might be unconstitutional to apply the [Hate Crimes Act] . . . if the weapon [the defendant] used had not traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or if he had not used any weapon at all”
• \[T]he jurisdictional element of [ § 249 ] ... is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Commerce Clause.\
• waiver voluntary despite 3 leg injury causing severe pain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).