Skip to main content

Albritton v. State

Citations

  • 81 Fla. 684
  • 88 So. 623

Syllabus

<p>1. In a trial for larceny, the non-consent of the owner must be proved, as it cannot be presumed from the taking.</p> <p>2. If the absence of the owner is satisfactorily accounted for his non-consent may be proved by circumstantial evidence, provided the circumstances are such as to exclude every reasonable presumption that the owner consented.</p>

Judges: Browne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.