· 1/5/1970
Albright v. Henry
Citations
- 174 N.W.2d 106
- 285 Minn. 452
- 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that because cancellation does not effect a valid foreclosure of an equitable mortgage, the contention that an equitable-mortgage claim must be asserted within the contract-for-deed redemption period is \entirely without authority or merit\
- noting that because cancellation does not effect a valid foreclosure of an equitable mortgage, the contention that an equitable-mortgage claim must be asserted within the contract-for-deed redemption period is “entirely without authority or merit”
- construing the municipal-court statute and finding that municipal courts must transfer an unlawful de-tainer case to the district court when an equitable defense is asserted because the court has no jurisdiction to hear the equitable defense
- private development, private mortgage financing, but federally-sponsored interest subsidy payments and mortgage insurance under 12 U.S.C.A., § 1715z-l
- private development, private mortgage financing, but federally-sponsored interest subsidy payments and mortgage insurance under 12 U.S.C.A., § 1715z-1
- “[W]hen the real nature of a transaction hetween the parties is that of >a loan ... whatever the form of the instrument of conveyance taken as the security, it is treated in equity as a mortgage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graff, Knutson, Murphy, Nelson, Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.