Skip to main content
· 1/5/1970

Albright v. Henry

Citations

  • 174 N.W.2d 106
  • 285 Minn. 452
  • 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that because cancellation does not effect a valid foreclosure of an equitable mortgage, the contention that an equitable-mortgage claim must be asserted within the contract-for-deed redemption period is \entirely without authority or merit\
  • noting that because cancellation does not effect a valid foreclosure of an equitable mortgage, the contention that an equitable-mortgage claim must be asserted within the contract-for-deed redemption period is “entirely without authority or merit”
  • construing the municipal-court statute and finding that municipal courts must transfer an unlawful de-tainer case to the district court when an equitable defense is asserted because the court has no jurisdiction to hear the equitable defense
  • private development, private mortgage financing, but federally-sponsored interest subsidy payments and mortgage insurance under 12 U.S.C.A., § 1715z-l
  • private development, private mortgage financing, but federally-sponsored interest subsidy payments and mortgage insurance under 12 U.S.C.A., § 1715z-1
  • “[W]hen the real nature of a transaction hetween the parties is that of >a loan ... whatever the form of the instrument of conveyance taken as the security, it is treated in equity as a mortgage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graff, Knutson, Murphy, Nelson, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.