Albright v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the West Virginia Code eliminated a race track’s unrestricted common law right to exclude licensees, but not its right to exclude patrons
• acknowledging that the legislature limited the common law right to exclude to licensees
• acknowledging that the legislature 7 limited the common law right to exclude to licensees
• “‘A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error . . . and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal.’ Syl. Pt. 1, in part, Maples v. W.Va. Dep’t of Commerce, Div. of Parks and Recreation, 197 W.Va. 318, 475 S.E.2d 410 (1996).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).