Albertson's, Inc. v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding jury’s finding of damages were unsupported where plaintiffs testimony did not associate each medical bill with injuries resulting from the accident
• holding jury's finding of damages were unsupported where plaintiff's testimony did not associate each medical bill with injuries resulting from the accident
• “It is well established that the plaintiff in a personal injury suit has the burden to prove the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses.”
• “It is well established that the plaintiff in a personal injury suit has the burden to prove the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses.” (citing Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla.1964))
• \It is well established that the plaintiff in a personal injury suit has the burden to prove the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses.\ (citing Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla.1964))
• personal injury case remanded where medical expenses erroneously admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).