District of Columbia· 5/19/2009
Alberts v. HCA INC.
Citations
- 405 B.R. 498
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43247
- 2009 WL 1384978
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “blatant abuse of the subpoena power is a common thread running through decisions in which sanctions have been awarded under Rule 45(c)(1)”
- observing that “blatant abuse of the subpoena power is a common thread running through decisions in which sanctions have been awarded under Rule 45(c)(1)”
- “[Bjlatent abuse of the subpoena power is a common thread running through decisions in which sanctions have been awarded under [Federal] Rule 45(c)(1).”
- “[T]he mere fact . . . that a disputed subpoena is ultimately deemed unwarranted does not, standing alone, demand the imposition of sanctions.”
- “The mere fact . . . that a disputed subpoena is ultimately deemed unwarranted does not, standing alone, demand the imposition of sanctions”
- “Rule 45(c)(1)” — the predecessor to Rule 45(d
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Ninth Circuit· 2012-11-26· cited 47×
- Precourt v. Fairbank Reconstruction Corp.D. South Dakota· 2011-05-05· cited 17×
- Tripoli Rocketry Ass'n v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-26· cited 11×
- Goldberg v. Amgen, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-08-21· cited 4×
- Bruce v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29· cited 1×
- The Rendon Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-11-08
- Tripoli Rocketry v. Bureau of AlcoholDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-26
- In Re: SubpoenaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-21
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 1,014×
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict of Columbia· 2001-07-24· cited 216×
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroD.C. Circuit· 1998-01-16· cited 70×
- Ellipso, Inc. v. MannDistrict of Columbia· 2006-11-02· cited 52×
- United States Ex Rel. K & R Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2006-10-11· cited 46×
- United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Marble Holding Co. v. Grunley ConstructionDistrict of Columbia· 2006-05-17· cited 20×
- Sokos v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District of Columbia· 2003-09-23· cited 18×
- Anderson v. Government of the Virgin IslandsVirgin Islands· 1998-06-09· cited 15×
- Abbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development, Co.District of Columbia· 2008-09-15· cited 14×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 1999-03-31· cited 10×
- Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2003-03-20· cited 4×
Other cases named Alberts v. HCA INC.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.