Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that plaintiff “had no prior notice that the company was considering eliminating the plant manager position,” even when plaintiff was involved in the restructuring efforts, supported finding of pretext
• holding that when a company “at different times, gives different explanations, a jury may infer that the articulated reasons are pretextual.”
• holding that a court “should not engage in credibility assessments” at the summary judgment stage
• finding that “determinations of motive and intent . . . are questions better suited for the jury”
• finding that “determinations of motive and intent . . . are questions better suited for the jury”
• finding that “determinations of motive and intent ... are questions better suited for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).