Alberta Gas Chemicals, Ltd. v. Celanese Corporation and Celanese Chemical Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• invoking “the power' of an administrative agency to insure the integrity of proceedings before it,” in action involving alleged perjured testimony in earlier ITC proceeding, -which had concluded
• “It is hard to imagine a clearer case for [the ITC] exercising this inherent power than when a fraud has been perpetrated on the tribunal in its initial proceeding.”
• “It is a well established principle that an administrative agency may reconsider its own decisions. ‘The power to reconsider is inherent in the power to decide.’ ”
• “[T]he [agency] will certainly be in a far better position than the ... court to determine whether it would have reached a different conclusion but for the [fraud].”
• “The public interest in preventing perjury is obvious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).