Albert W. Turner and Therese L. Turner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Albert W. Turner and Therese L. Turner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clearly erroneous standard of review applies to subordinate facts, but ultimate conclusion to be drawn therefrom constitutes a question of law
• clearly erroneous standard of review applies to subordinate facts, but ultimate conclusion to be drawn therefrom constitutes a question of law
• “clearly erroneous” rule applies to “subordinate facts,” but “ultimate conclusion” is treated as a “question of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).