Albert v. Martin Custom Made Tires Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant who properly filed an objection in accordance with the notice he received from the trial court had standing to appeal
• holding that appellant who properly filed an objection in accordance with the notice he received from the trial court had standing to appeal
• concluding that fees were unwarranted when the plaintiffs had failed to establish a substantial benefit
• permitting nonparty shareholder to appeal award of legal fees to counsel for stockholder’s derivative action because shareholder objected to the fee award before the district court
• “Rand properly filed objections to the proposed allowance of attorney’s fees in accordance with the notice given as required by the district court, and ... such an objector in a stockholders’ derivative action has standing to prosecute an appeal.”
• rejecting the Seventh Circuit's broad reading of Marino in Felzen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).