Albert v. City of Hartford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the police chief was not the final policymaker as to the hiring and firing of employees where his discretion was constrained by city policies, including an anti-discrimination policy
• holding that the police chief was not the final policymaker as to the hiring and firing of employees where his discretion was constrained by city policies, including an anti-discrimination policy
• holding that the Police Chief was not a policymaker, because his decisionmaking was “constrained by policies set forth in the Personnel Rules, the Court of Common Council and the City Manager” as well as by the city charter, which contained an anti-discrimination provision
• “A plaintiff may satisfy the ‘policy, custom or practice’ requirement by demonstrating in one of four ways: (1) a formal policy which is officially endorsed by the municipality; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).