Albert v. Carovano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the students’ complaint does not specify which rights they claim to have been deprived of, we note that, at a minimum, the students’ protected liberty interest is at stake because of the ‘stigma’ attached to suspension from college for disciplinary reasons.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sykes v. Bank of America
  Second Circuit· 2013-07-24· cited 1,352×
• Barbara Monsky, for Herself and on Behalf of All Women Similarly Situated v. Honorable Howard J. Moraghan
  Second Circuit· 1997-10-02· cited 194×
• Robert G. Boyle v. The Governor's Veterans Outreach & Assistance Center
  Third Circuit· 1991-01-31· cited 98×
• East v. City of Chicago
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-07-18· cited 18×
• Josh Tunca, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, a Chartered Illinois Hospital and the Board of Directors of Lutheran General Hospital
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 17×
• Merola v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1988-02-12· cited 13×
• Donohue v. Baker
  N.D. New York· 1997-09-05· cited 11×
• Drake v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1996-04-26· cited 10×
• Russell v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 1990-09-25· cited 6×
• Atkinson v. B.C.C. Associates, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1993-08-12· cited 6×
• Hamlin Ex Rel. Hamlin v. City of Peekskill Board of Education
  S.D. New York· 2005-07-13· cited 5×
• Feeney v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1988-08-11· cited 4×
• Albert v. Carovano
  Second Circuit· 1987-07-21
• Albert v. Carovano
  Second Circuit· 1988-06-28
• Donnelly v. Kutztown Area Transport Service, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-07-29