Albert v. Blue Diamond Growers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• efforts to “conserve judicial resources and promote judicial economy” promote the “interests of non-parties and the public”
• efforts to “conserve judicial resources and promote judicial economy” promote the “interests of non-parties and the public”
• under these circumstances, a stay would clearly “promote the interests of non-parties and the public to conserve judicial resources and promote judicial economy.”
• under these circumstances, a stay would clearly “promote the interest of non-parties and the public to conserve judicial resources and promote judicial economy.”
• “[A] stay in this case would promote the interests of non-parties and the public to conserve judicial resources and promote judicial economy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-11-30· cited 11×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nken v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-22· cited 3,500×
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 484×
• Tbk Partners, Ltd. v. Western Union Corporation, Frances D. Spier, Objectors-Appellants
  Second Circuit· 1982-03-18· cited 184×
• Kappel v. Comfort
  S.D. New York· 1996-02-15· cited 104×
• Caspian Investments, Ltd. v. Vicom Holdings, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1991-07-31· cited 42×
• MALDONADO-PADILLA v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2011-06-24· cited 17×
• Levin v. HSBC Bank, N.A.
  E.D. New York· 2015-04-09· cited 11×

Other cases named Albert v. Blue Diamond Growers

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Albert v. Blue Diamond Growers
  S.D. New York· 2015-10-21· cited 6×