Albert R. Piarowski v. Illinois Community College District 515, Prairie State College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stained glass windows, as “art for art’s sake,” were protected under the First Amendment
• concluding that the First Amendment protects “art for art’s sake”
• no First Amendment violation where college chose to remove from walls artwork whose prominence and location implied college approval and not just custody
• stained glass windows on display in an art gallery at a junior college
• stained glass windows on display in an art gallery at a junior college
• stained glass windows on display in an art gallery at a junior college

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).