Albert Mackie Grocery Co. v. Pratt
Citations
- 114 La. 341
- 38 So. 250
- 1905 La. LEXIS 466
Syllabus
<p>SUSPENSIVE APPEAL — ABSTRACT QUESTIONS— SUPREME COURT — JURISDICTIONCERTIORARI.</p> <p>1. There is no necessity or occasion for a suspensive appeal from an order of court when the party applying for the same has, by his voluntary action, made judicial execution of the order impossible.</p> <p>2. Where the only issues submitted to the Supreme Court for decision on an application for a writ of prohibition and certiorari have become abstract questions, or affect, at the utmost, matters over which, presumptively, the Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction, by reason of the amounts likely to be involved, the Supreme Court will not presently take jurisdiction over the matter.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an ALJ is not required to “specifically explain how he considered [a] finding of prior disability adjudication”
- finding that a subsequent ALJ did not err by considering a prior ALJ’s findings in denying the claim when the time periods considered by the ALJs were separated by “only three months”
- following the rationale that the new hearing officer’s RFC must be supported by substantial evidence to stand
- an ALJ is not required to “specifically explain how he considered [a] finding of a prior disability adjudication”
- declining to apply rule to pre-2017 claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Decree, Monroe, Nicholls, Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.