Albert Einstein Medical Center v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the bona fide sale requirement is a “reasonable interpretation” of the regulations for merging providers
• noting that “requiring ‘reasonable consideration’ is in keeping with the underlying and long-standing purpose of the Medicare Act, i.e., to reimburse for only actual and reasonable costs”
• limiting its analysis to the bona fide sale issue because it is a “sufficient independent basis on which to deny Einstein’s claim”
• limiting its analysis to the bona fide sale issue because it is a ―sufficient independent basis on which to deny Einstein‘s claim‖
• declining to reach the related parties issue because the bona fide sale issue was a “sufficient independent basis” to sustain the Administrator’s action
• finding this change only an interpretive clarification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).