Skip to main content
· 12/19/1989

Albert Einstein Medical Center v. National Benefit Fund for Hospital & Health Care Employees

Citations

  • 740 F. Supp. 343
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15191
  • 1989 WL 222449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “estoppel” claim is preempted by ERISA
  • an assignee of a plan participant has standing to bring an ERISA cause of action against the Plan.
  • in dicta, “... I believe that ERISA does not forbid assignment by a beneficiary of his right to reimbursement to a health care provider nor does it forbid an ERISA plan from reimbursing the health care provider directly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanartsdalen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.