· 1/8/2013
Albert Cunningham v. Robert Wong
Citations
- 704 F.3d 1143
- 2013 WL 69198
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding there was no prejudice where the “comments were a single paragraph of a twenty-page argument and the trial judge explained to the jury that closing arguments are not evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Gould, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.