Skip to main content
· 4/20/1990

Albert C. Dayton v. Consolidation Coal Company Office of Workers' Compensation Program

Citations

  • 895 F.2d 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in reviewing the decision of the Benefits Review Board, the court must confine itself to the grounds upon which the Board based its decision and may not consider determinations of the ALJ that were not addressed by the Board
  • appellate court must confine itself to review of grounds upon which ALJ relied in reaching his/her decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Hall, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.