Skip to main content
· 1/7/2013

Albert Autry v. Fort Bend Independent Sch Dist

Citations

  • 704 F.3d 344
  • 2013 WL 68730
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 384
  • 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,737
  • 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing failure to promote 13 Indeed, the terms “color” and “national origin” do not appear anywhere in Edrich’s briefing. (See ECF No. 23). claims asserted under Title VII
  • referring to McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802–805 (1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Owen, Southwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.