Skip to main content
· 4/18/1969

Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co.

Citations

  • 167 N.W.2d 500
  • 283 Minn. 246
  • 1969 Minn. LEXIS 1142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the purpose of serving the mechanic’s lien statement is to “put the owner on notice that the contractor is not paying his bills”
  • construing the requirement that notice of a lien must be filed within 90 days of last material furnished to include material furnished in a different state
  • Minnesota lien law did not apply to portion of construction project located in Wisconsin
  • “It has been held in Minnesota that one supplying material such as petroleum products to a builder who uses such products while engaged in the construction of the improvement is a person furnishing liena-ble materials within the meaning of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson, Nelson, Sheran, Peterson, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.