Skip to main content
· 3/21/1960

Albaugh v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 362 U.S. 918
  • 80 S. Ct. 669
  • 4 L. Ed. 2d 738
  • 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting with respect to a complex, eight-week long RICO trial that “[f]or such a trial to proceed smoothly, it was necessary for the trial judge to exercise tight control over the presentation of the evidence to the jury”
  • no prejudice where judge fined lawyer for contempt in presence of jury
  • \A statistical count of court interruptions is perLinent to the inquiry.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.