· 10/25/1990
Albany v. Arcata Associates, Inc.
Citations
- 799 P.2d 566
- 106 Nev. 688
- 1990 Nev. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction aver an appeal from an order imposing sanctions upon an attorney where the attorney was not a party to the underlying litigation
- holding that an attorney for defendants could not appeal an order imposing sanctions upon him because he was not a party to the action, and observing that the attorney's appropriate remedy was to petition this court for extraordinary relief
- holding that an attorney for defendants could not appeal an order imposing sanctions upon him because he was not a party to the action, and observing that the attorney's appropriate remedy was to petition this court for extraordinary relief
- attorney who was not a party to district court action had no right to appeal sanctions order
- attorney who was aggrieved by district court judgment could not appeal because he was not a party
- attorney for defendants could not appeal order of sanctions because he was not a party to the action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.