Skip to main content
· 10/25/1990

Albany v. Arcata Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 799 P.2d 566
  • 106 Nev. 688
  • 1990 Nev. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction aver an appeal from an order imposing sanctions upon an attorney where the attorney was not a party to the underlying litigation
  • holding that an attorney for defendants could not appeal an order imposing sanctions upon him because he was not a party to the action, and observing that the attorney's appropriate remedy was to petition this court for extraordinary relief
  • holding that an attorney for defendants could not appeal an order imposing sanctions upon him because he was not a party to the action, and observing that the attorney's appropriate remedy was to petition this court for extraordinary relief
  • attorney who was not a party to district court action had no right to appeal sanctions order
  • attorney who was aggrieved by district court judgment could not appeal because he was not a party
  • attorney for defendants could not appeal order of sanctions because he was not a party to the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.