Skip to main content
· 12/20/1938

Albany Peanut Co. v. Euclid Candy Co.

Citations

  • 30 Cal. App. 2d 35
  • 85 P.2d 471
  • 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A mere promise to execute a written contract, followed by refusal to do so, is not sufficient to create an estoppel [with the effect of .a contract], even though reliance is placed on such promise and damage is occasioned by such refusal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.