Albahary v. City of Bristol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Appellate Court properly determined that, generally, under principles of inverse condemnation, a property owner may seek compensation in an eminent domain proceeding for pretaking damages caused by the condemnor.”
• “[w]e conclude that we need not determine in the present case whether the [state] was aggrieved because we may treat its claim as an alternate ground for affirmance”
• whether doctrine of collateral estoppel applied is question of law subject to plenary review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).